Discover the amazing world of Indonesia


An Ethical Shopping Survey

Recently we ambushed Oxford Street shoppersbad ventilation, overcrowded factories which
for a survey on ethical shopping. But as weare a fire risk and unsanitary bathrooms. 63%
pounded the pavements of central London weof New York factories violate minimum wage
found lots of shoppers asking us the sameand overtime restrictions. The majority of
questions. Why should we care aboutworkers in the US garment industry are
sweatshops? What are they? Shouldnt people beimmigrant women and many are verbally or even
grateful for any work they can get? If theyphysically abused and intimidated if they
werent working in a sweatshop wouldnt thespeak out. They can also be threatened with
workers be worse off? How can we changedeportation. In 2002 the GMB found in two
things? The answers are not always clear-cut,weeks at least three sweatshops operating in
but we hope that this outline guide will bustthe East End of London. Less than minimum
a few myths about sweatshop workers, ownerswage, transgression of health and safety
and customers. What is a sweatshop anyway?regulations and excessive hours were all
The word sweatshop described a nineteenthcited. How low is low? For Nike workers in
century system where subcontractors sweatedIndonesia one chicken costs more then a days
out profits from the difference between thewages. Childrens cough medicine is 121% of a
price of their product and the wages theybasic daily wage and you would have to save 4
paid. In the 21st Century the system is stilldays wages to buy a pair of jeans. But what
thriving. Sweatshops are generally definedcan the companies do - if they put up their
as workplaces exploiting manual labourers.prices to pay wages, sales will fall and so
This refers to wages that are below the costwill jobs? The Chief Executive of The Gap in
of living, dangerous working conditions and1999 earned in excess of $7,000,000 - yes,
arbitrary discipline such as physical andseven million dollars a year -according to
verbal abuse. A typical example is the NikeSweatshop Watch, while the average worker in
factories in Indonesia, which according toChina would be paid just 23 cents-an-hour.
the Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC) report inThe answer doesnt seem to hard- ask the CEO
March 2002, paid its workers so little theyto take a small pay cut. If this seems unfair
cannot afford to have their children livingperhaps the answer is to cut the advertising
with them. The factory also refuses to buybudget. Global Exchange says Nike spends
their workers protective equipment.$560million on advertising, that means if it
Ironically employees making Nikes state-of-spent 2% less it could bring the whole of its
the-art trainers may lose their own feetVietnamese workers wages up to a living wage,
because the factory will not provide themas requested by Vietnamese Labour Watch.
with strong shoes to safeguard them from theCant we just boycott these companies? For
heavy machinery they work with. Why domost of us the knee-jerk reaction is to stop
people work in Sweatshops? Because they havebuying products made by sweat or child
no other choice. Companies take theirlabour. But according to NGOs and The
factories to areas where wages are low andInternational Labour Organisation (ILO),
there is less emphasis on workers rights. Theconsumer boycotts can harm workers more than
cost of living may be less then in developedthe company. When sweatshops using child
nations, but the minimum wage of theselabour were closed in Bangladesh and Pakistan
countries does not even cover this. Countriesthrough consumer pressure Save the Children,
such as China are particularly attractive,along with Bangladeshi NGOs, pointed out
not just for their low wages but also becausechildren were merely forced into worse forms
of their repressive apparatus and corporateof labour. This was because children often
secrecy, which make human rights hard tobrought in 30% of a familys income. As girls
patrol. In a Chinese factory contracting forwere only allowed to work in domestic
Disney, workers were threatened orservice, prostitution or brick breaking,
intimidated to ensure they would falsifyescaping from the garment industry was not
their work records and lie to any groups whoalways an improvement. But, boycotts called
arrived to monitor working conditions (CCCby the workers themselves can be effective.
report February 2001). Foreign-ownedWorkers at Forever 21 in Los Angeles are
companies keep their costs down by not havingtrying to make this multi-million pound
sick pay, pension insurance or maternitycompany pay the back wages they owe them.
leave. If workers demand better pay, or ifAfter working 10 to 12 hours a day for below
demand dries up the company has no difficultyminimum wage and no overtime in appalling
in packing up and leaving the country leavingconditions they are taking their employers to
employees destitute. Isnt it better thencourt and trying to ensure a fair deal for
unemployment? The only answer to this is whyothers. Further Information The easiest and
should there only be two choices?most effective way to help improve the lives
Multinational clothing companies spendof garment workers is to make sure the shops
literally millions of pounds on advertisingyou buy from know you care about how their
and paying their CEO each year- surely someclothes are made not just what they look
of this money could be spent paying workerslike.
enough so they can buy basic necessities?
Sweatshops are all in the Third World ?I work for the organic clothes directory
right? No. According to Sweatshop Watch 98%which also sells fairtrade clothes plus
of garment workers in Los Angeles have healthwe have fairtrade articles for you to read
and safety problems, which could lead toor publish.
serious injury or even death. These include



1 A B C D E F 84 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130