The Crusader vs. The Caliphate...Bush Doctrine: The Heretics of Islam Must Be Destroyed

President Bush's speech in October before thespiritual authority but was not permitted prophetic
National Endowment for Democracy crystalizedpower; this was reserved for Muhammad. The
his doctrine: The Bush Doctrine. In sum: The UScaliph could not, therefore, exercise authority in
has devoted herself to a relentless war withmatters of religious doctrine. The first caliph was
radical Islamic terrorists to the death--these areAbu Bakr . He was succeeded by Umar , Uthman
the heretics of Islam, and they must be, and Ali . Sunni Muslims recognize these first four,
destroyed!or Rashidun (the rightly guided), caliphs. Shiites ,
THE GREEN CURTAINhowever, recognize Ali as the first caliph. After
From the Pillars of Hercules in the Atlantic to theAli's death, Muawiya became caliph and founded
Indonesia Archipelago in the Pacific, a vile andthe Umayyad dynasty (661-750), chiefly by force
putrid Green Curtain threatens its descent toof arms. Its capital was Damascus. In 750 the
enshroud and enslave a vast swath of earth'sAbbasid family, descended from the Prophet's
inhabitants. An Islamic Empire, the resurrection ofuncle, led a coalition that defeated (749-50) the
the Moslem Caliphate, envelopes "with greaterUmayyad family." (
economic and military and political power . . . ableBut, one thing is altogether certain-Islam's religious
to advance their stated agenda: to developtolerance, though incessantly touted as
weapons of mass destruction . . . destroy Israel . .widespread and obvious-was and is hardly the
. intimidate Europe . . . assault the American peoplecase! All the rhetoric to the contrary, Islam's
. . . and blackmail our government into isolation."toleration of Christian, Jew, Hindu, or of Buddhism
(Remarks by President Bush before the NationalConfucius, is NOT borne out in the record. That is
Endowment for Democracy on the War onprecisely why Bush's appeal to "religious freedom"
Terror, October, 2005).(and he knows exactly how this "sounds" in the
"We will confront this mortal danger to allWest-secular and/or religious) does NOT play out
humanity . . . We will not tire, or rest . . . we willin Islam:
see freedom's victory . . . we must stop them . . ."We're standing with dissidents and exiles against
we will never back down, never give in, andoppressive regimes, because we know that the
never accept anything less than complete victorydissidents of today will be the democratic leaders
. . . there is no peace without victory . . . we willof tomorrow. We're making our case through
keep our nerve and we will win that victory!public diplomacy, stating clearly and confidently our
"The militants believe that controlling one countrybelief in self-determination, and the rule of law,
will rally the Muslim masses, enabling them toand religious freedom, and equal rights for
overthrow all moderate governments in thewomen, beliefs that are right and true in every
region, and establish a radical Islamic empire thatland, and in every culture. (Applause.)
spans from Spain to Indonesia . . . they areDoes he know what he is saying? He most
fanatical and extreme . . . utterly committed . . .assuredly does! Imagine the sound of "religious
As Zarqawi has vowed, 'We will either achievefreedom" and "equal rights for women" in the ear
victory over the human race or we will pass toof Islam? Is he aware how this reverberates
the eternal life' . . . we must stop them beforewithin the hearts and souls of all who aspire for
their crimes can multiply!" (Excerpts from Bush'sthe Caliphate? He certainly does.
speech.)Does such rhetoric enflame the masses of those
(who oppose his policies in the Middle East-though
THE WAR AGAINST HUMANITYthey are altruistic and even noble in their essence?
The battle lines are clearly drawn; the identity ofCould he have left this out of his speech without
the implacable foe utterly delineated; the sinistercompromising his persuasions for "democracy and
intentions and methodologies of this cowardly lotfreedom" for all Islamic peoples-especially in the
have been, by our President, exposed before theMiddle East? Perhaps? But I doubt-besides, he
whole world for what they really are: THEMUST galvanize the West's opposition to the
HERETICS OF ISLAM!tyrannical evil who opposes them-and there is no
Furthermore, "these extremists want to endgreater appeal (certainly not the ideology of
American and Western influence in the broaderdemocracy) that will heighten the confrontation
Middle East, because we stand for democracyagainst another "evil empire" than the call to
and peace, and stand in the way of theirRELIGIOUS FREEDOM.
ambitions (as quoted by Osama bin Laden, AlThe very first phrase and article of our beloved
Qaeda's leader): '(We) dedicate our resources,Constitution enshrines it: FREEDOM OF RELIGION!
sons and money to driving the infidels out of (our)Barbara Walters interview with Saudi's King
lands . . . The whole world is watching this warAbdullah skirted the issue of religious freedom-lest
and the two adversaries (viz. Western Civilizationthe "progressive king" (keeper of the shrines of
vs. Islamic Civilization) . . . It's either victory andIslam) should be unfavorably embarrassed!
glory, or misery and humiliation!" (OBL).Indeed ABC headlines the article regarding the civil
The President likened "Radical Islam's . . . warrights of Saudi's women, but tip-toes around the
against humanity" (i.e., the "civilized world") to themore inflammatory issue of religious freedom;
struggle against fanatical despots like Hitler, Stalin,instead, we read this artful insinuation into the
and Pol Pot-branding them all as "EVIL MEN,text of the story:
obsessed with ambition and unburdened by"In the two months since becoming Saudi Arabia's
conscience."new monarch, King Abdullah has continued to walk
Theirs is a "murderous ideology . . . the greata diplomatic tightrope, assuring the West -
challenge of our new century!" They are the killersparticularly the United States - of his country's
of "Daniel Pearl, Nicholas Berg, Margaret Hassancommitment to reform and assuring domestic
and of Theo Van Gogh." They justify theirreligious leaders of his commitment to Islamic law
random killings " . . . because I believe you are anand tradition." (
infidel."King Abdullah knows full well that it is mandatory
They hide behind the "veneer of religious rhetoric .to placate "domestic religious leaders of his
. . (they wish to) rule the soul itself . . . Whilecommitment to Islamic law and tradition!" And,
promising a future of justice and holiness." Indeed,what might that "Islamic law and tradition" dictate:
the President's religious definitions/expressions"Saudi Arabia is an Islamic monarchy without legal
swirl throughout his entire speech: "The excusesprotection for freedom of religion, and such
for violence (range from) the Israeli presence onprotection does not exist in practice. Islam is the
the West Bank . . . the U.S. military presence inofficial religion, and the law requires that all citizens
Saudi Arabia . . . the defeat of the Taliban . . . orbe Muslims. The Government prohibits the public
the CRUSADES of a thousand years ago."practice of non-Muslim religions. The Government
COMMUNISM'S IDEOLOGY WAS DEFEATED-SOrecognizes the right of non-Muslims to worship in
WILL THEIRS-WITH AN "IRON FIST"private; however, it does not always respect this
President Bush asserts that we have been at warright in practice." (Note: This little "tidbit" of
for the past quarter of a century against thisinformation is propagated by the US State
ubiquitous foe. He likens the present struggleDepartment:
against "Islamo-fascism, Islamic radicalism, militant(
Jihadism" to the "ideology of communism . . .Can the Saudis have it both ways-be an alleged
gulags . . . the Cultural Revolution . . . and the killingally of the US in the War on Terror (as President
fields." The victory the West won against theBush claims they are) while prohibiting "freedom
by-gone "totalitarian aims" of communism, willof religion?" "We're encouraging our friends in the
repeat its triumph over "the rise of a deadlyMiddle East, including Egypt and Saudi Arabia, to
enemy and the unfolding of a global ideologicaltake the path of reform, to strengthen their own
struggle."societies in the fight against terror by respecting
Not only do those who aspire to the resuscitationthe rights and choices of their own people." In
of the Caliphate wish to expunge the West'sthat very paragraph of his speech Bush touts the
influences from the "broader Middle East," they,concept of religious freedom!
according to Bush, "regard Iraq as the centralSOCIALISM & ISLAM HAVE A COMMON
front in their war against humanity." Iraq hasFOE
become-for better or worse-the "central front" inThe world-that is, the Western World-reeled
America's War on Terror. If the "militants" persistunder the religious and social reverberations of the
in Iraq, they will "rally the Muslim masses . . .Reformation in the 1400-1500s. Few realize the
overthrow all moderate governments in theprofound socio-political upheavals wrought by the
region . . . and establish a radical Islamic empire"first manifestations wrought by religious freedom
(i.e., the Caliphate).as a result of the breakup of Catholicism's
But, again, as the communists suffered defeat,monopoly. One forgets the brutal suppression of
even so, they who claim that Americans are "thethe Peasants' Revolt. Thomas Munzer, who
most cowardly of God's creatures" (i.e., Mr.experimented with a "new spiritual kingdom," was
Zarqawi) shall likewise "condemn themselves toperhaps the first in the relatively modern era to
isolation, decline, and collapse . . . because freeembrace communist theory and practice!
peoples will own the future." No, the US will not"He denounced established governments, and
leave a "vacuum" in Iraq for their dastardly aimsadvocated common ownership of the means of
to multiply . . . they will be crushed by Operationlife. After a tour in south Germany be returned to
Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom,Mulhausen, overthrew the governing body of the
OPERATION IRON FURY, OPERATION IRONcity, and established a communistic theocracy.
FIST . . . ad nausea, ad infinitum.The Peasants' War had already broken out in
OPERATION IRON FIST IS BIGGER THAN IRAQvarious parts of Germany; and as the peasantry
Alas! The US military has no end in announcing yetaround Mulhausen was imbued with Munzer's
another operation to smash the burgeoningteaching, he collected a large body of men to
insurgency now, according to CNN (October 15,plunder the surrounding country. He established his
2005), flush with some 200,000 militants . . .camp at Frankenhausen; but on the 15th of May
wherein some 10,000 have been slain, 30,0001525 the peasants were dispersed by Philip,
imprisoned and some 300 to 400 infractions occurlandgrave of Hesse, who captured Munzer and
each week! Iron-Bullet, Fist, Force, Fury, Grip,executed him on the 27th at Mulhausen."
Hammer, Justice, Promise, Resolve, Saber . . . andFrom here the West waited until the French
the list continues to grow! (List of MilitaryRevolution to experiment with capitalism's alleged
Operations and Non-Military Operations) (opposite (now taking root in America)-and a "Tale
In addition to this "must win" aforementioned ironof Two Cities" could not have been told so well!
resolve-a sort of "Triumph of the Will"-styleSocialism's rebirth caved to dictatorship (Napoleon)
determination-epitomized by President Bushand to ultimate monarchy again.
himself, those "helpers and enablers" of theNever totally lost in the consciousness of
would-be Caliphate, SYRIA and IRAN, shall NOTthinkers-communism lurched forward and Marxist
go unpunished . . .Socialism/Communism became the dominant
" . . . authoritarian regimes, allies of convenienceSocialist philosophy (overcoming all Christian
like Syria and Iran, that share the goal of hurtingattempts at the same-Joshua Muravchick's article:
American and moderate Muslim governments, andSocialism vs. Religion, details the struggle and the
use terrorist propaganda to blame their ownfinal victory over theism-
failures on the West and America, on the Jews . .Finally, Socialism's paradox (National Socialism and
. we're determined (against Syrian and Iran) toCommunist Socialism) culminated in World War II
deny radical groups the support and sanctuary ofand the Cold War. Finally, the "Evil Empire"
outlaw regimes . . . STATE-SPONSORS like Syriaimploded. Thus, with the violent conclusion of
and Iran have a long history of collaboration withNational Socialism, and the ignoble demise of
terrorists, and they DESERVE NO PATIENCECommunist-Stalinism, as well as the birth of
FROM THE VICTIMS OF TERROR. The UnitedChinese Neo-Communism (Party-Controlled
States makes no distinction between those whoCapitalism), the world appeared restful. Alas! One
commit acts of terror and those who supportlast bastion of true socialism persists (aside from
and harbor them, BECAUSE THEY'RE EQUALLYNorth Korea/Cuba): The oligarchs of the Middle
AS GUILTY OF MURDER (Applause fromEast!
audience). Any government that chooses to be an"Baath(ist) Socialism in Iraq, Syria, and Libya
ally of terror has also chosen to be an enemy ofincorporate a toxic amalgam of Islam and
civilization . . . and the civilized world must holdSocialism similar to the German Nazi combination
those regimes to account."of new age neo-paganism and socialism. Islamic
Be it abundantly clear to the entire world: SYRIAnations have no defined concept of separation of
and IRAN, the enemies of civilization, shall be "heldpowers, an independent judiciary, private
to account" . . . they are the "enemies ofproperty, free enterprise, free speech or free
civilization . . . "THEY'RE EQUALLY GUILTY OFpress.
MURDER!""Non-Islamic minorities, called 'Dhimmis,' are allowed
Not only is Bush determined to extinguish theto live at the whim of the state as long as they
spiritual aspirations of Caliphate from the OBL's ofsubmit to second-class status and pay a yearly
the world, and not only will he prohibit theirextortion. This way they are allowed, in most
acquisitions of any state, but he most certainly willcases, to live yet another year without converting
in accordance with his military plan and "offensiveto Islam. Islamic defenders refer to this system
operations . . . clear out enemy forces" fromas an example of Islamic tolerance."(Free
those states which "collaborate with terrorists!"Republic--
Listen-first SYRIA is mentioned, then IRAN . . . isIt is no small secret that Baathist Socialism and
that coincidental? I think not-for it is in thatthe Left, in general, share a common
precise order that "freedom" and "democracy"consternation towards the American New World
shall extend her grip on the region!Order System-a system wherein the rich get
The "enemy" shall be denied "control of anyricher and the poor, poorer-where the "disparity
nation!" For this very reason was the Talibanof wealth" continues unabated;
ousted from Afghanistan; and, it is for this veryNOTWITHSTANDING ALL THE RHETORIC TO
reason why the US co-labors with Musharraf "toTHE CONTRARY!
oppose and isolate the militants in Pakistan."In his classic text, "Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam
To achieve all the above stated goals, the nobleand the American Left," David Horowitz provides
extensions of DEMOCRACY and HOPE shall bea damning critique of America's Left-extrapolating
spread across the broader Middle East.their connivance with radical Islam and likening it to
DENYING JIHADISTS RECRUITS THROUGHthe Hitler-Stalin Pact of the 20th Century. In other
DEMOCRACYwords: They will stop at no lengths to attack
Yes, we shall "deny the militants future recruitsBabylon the Great!
by replacing hatred and resentment withI have meandered all over the socio-political
democracy and hope across the broader Middlemap-without going into elaborate detail
East . . . there's no alternative . . . OUR FUTUREreferences-highlighting the American Left (world
AND THE FUTURE OF THAT REGION ARELeft) and Islam (seemingly poles apart), who have
LINKED . . . America is making this stand!"purposefully and/or unwittingly ascribed to the old
Indeed, as Condi Rice clearly enunciated AmericanArab dictum: The enemy of my enemy is my
foreign policy in February of 2005 at thefriend!
American University in Cairo:What Horowitz fails to calculate is the simple fact
"For 60 years, the United States pursued stabilityAmerica's Left is not monolithic, nor is its Right
at the expense of democracy in the Middle East -(though I'm sure he gives mental ascent to this
and we achieved neither.troubling thought). However, both Left and Right in
"Now, we are taking a different course. We areAmericana are loathe to outrage over the
supporting the democratic aspirations of all people"wishy-washy center-a center whose pompous
(American University Cairo, Feb. 9, 2005).protestations are adjudged by both as unworthy
No longer will Middle East despots receive a politein galvanizing any base.
nod from their Western patrons; instead, theyTHIS CRUSADE...THIS WAR ON TERRORISM
shall be vanquished from their dictatorial ways,I have presented before you a decisively religious
from their absolutist and tribal monarchies-onceunderstanding on the part of our President in his
and for all!efforts to "stay the course" and rally American
Yes, a "different course" - altogether different!public opinion to his cause. Without projecting the
What you are witnessing here is an all outtone and substance of this debate within the
diplomatic-military effort to radically alter thenomenclature of evangelical rhetoric-let alone
course of Middle Eastern history/culture throughideological terminology-the American public will
the aggressive propagation of "democracy"-forNOT persist in the efforts of the one who (along
"Wars are not won without sacrifice -- and thiswith America's representatives) first announced
war will require more sacrifice, more time, andimmediately after 9/11:
more resolve.""They have attacked America because we are
This war, according to Bush, is fought on twofreedom's home and defender; this crusade, this
levels, two primary fronts: The terrestrial (earthlywar on terrorism, is going to take a while, but we
military) and the psychological (ideological battle forwill rid the world of the evil-doers." - President
the minds and hearts of the people).George W. Bush (September 16, 2001)
Notwithstanding the overt attempt to persuade"We are coming after you. God may have mercy
the world that such be the case, there ison you, but we won't," Sen. John McCain (R-AZ).
another-though it be deeply embedded within the"Bomb the hell out of them. If there's collateral
rhetoric of his doctrine discharged before thedamage, so be it. They certainly found our civilians
National Endowment for Democracy: Theto be expendable," Sen. Zell Miller (D-GA).
CELESTIAL!"Deputy Secretary of Defense (Now President of
THE SPIRITUAL CONFRONTATION OF THEthe World Bank) Paul Wolfowitz says that we are
AGESgoing to 'end states' that sponsor terrorism, and
"Evil men, obsessed with ambition and unburdenedour entire government puts the world on notice
by conscience, must be taken verythat everyone must 'choose sides,' that we no
serious(ly)-and we must stop them before theirlonger differentiate between terrorists and the
crimes can multiply." There is, most definitely,countries they may live in, and that they are
religious symbolism and tone throughout theeither 'with us or against us'" (Ramzi Kysia, The
President's impassioned pleas for "freedom andLast Crusade-
democracy." To conclude otherwise misses theFurthermore, the relentless barrage launched by
entire significance of the speech-its raisonthe Bush Administration in the globalization of the
d'être. To bestir, persuade, and enflame theWar on Terror is laced throughout with the
conscience to sacrifice in defeating this globalhyperbole of religious expression-no wonder
contagion-he must couch the parameters of theRayan El-Amine posits what lies within most
conflict in terms of spirituality! For . . .Moslem minds (notwithstanding the "Moslem Silent
"These extremists distort the idea of jihad into aMajority" of moderates):
call for terrorist murder against Christians and"The green menace has replaced the red menace,
Jews and Hindus . . . Muslim scholars have alreadyand the 'evil empire' of the cold war has become
publicly condemned terrorism . . . 'Whoever doesthe less eloquent, but just as deadly, "evil doers"
such a thing is not a Muslim, nor a religious person'of the Arab and Muslim world . . . The backward
(Chapter 5, Verse 32 of the Koran)."and seemingly static image of the Arab that
Here is one who decisively marshals theOliphant (i.e., Pat Oliphant), Hollywood and the Bush
resistance of his implacable foe at the very rootadministration have projected comes from classic
of their strength: The Spirit! It is mandatory thatcolonial notions of Western superiority. The
he split Islam-acclaim the foundations ofrhetoric by George Bush and Condoleezza Rice
Mohammed are predicated upon PEACE!about bringing freedom and democracy to the
Naturally, and historically, the foundations of Islam,Arab world is no different from the British and
and the emergence of the Caliphate wrought theFrench in the 19th century talking about civilizing
separation of the Sunni and the Shiite sects ofIndia and Africa. Neo-conservatives and right wing
Islam:think tanks see the Arab world as a colonial
"The rulership of Islam; caliph, the spiritual headproject in which Arabs need to be subdued and
and temporal ruler of the Islamic state. In principle,civilized. Edward Said, in his definitive work of how
Islam is theocratic: when Muhammad the Prophetthe West sees the East, Orientalism, explains how
died, a caliph [Arab.,=successor] was chosen tothe same system of analysis justifies control and
rule in his place. The caliph had temporal andsuperiority today.