The China Syndrome - selective capitalism should not hide the obvious future conflict with Beijing

For those so inclined the big money in investingexperience a surge in economic performance in
and high returns lies in the economic accessionthe coming generation. Assuming that the Chinese
and growth of India and particularly China. Chineseeconomy continues to maintain the pace to which
index funds returned more than 40% in 2006 andit has grown accustomed during the last 15 years
expect more of the same in 2007. Chinese andof globalization and liberalization (not a certainty
Indian demand will keep oil and commodity pricesbut not out of the question), its emergence as a
high for the next 5 years. Another play on thepotential US rival in the Asian region may be
China syndrome? - buy Exxon and hold. For thereached faster than some experts expect. Such a
small investor the awakening of Napoleon'sdevelopment will not only affect the dynamic of
sleeping giant is a boon but how about for theJapan's role in a re-vitalised East Asia, but also
political-economy of East Asia and the Pacific?may well introduce new stresses and strains in
How should we view China beyond being a placeSino-American economic and political relations as
of profits and high returns? China's inaction onboth actors jostle for influence within an East Asia
North Korea and its stalking of Russian resourcesincreasingly split between the second 'Greater
should provide some clear clues.Chinese' area and the rest who would still be
There are actually 2 China's. One China is the 1.3dependent on the US and Japanese markets. The
billion strong Communist dictatorship that issplitting of East Asia into two spheres is a more
selectively opening up its markets in order toprobable outcome of Sino-US IPE competition
survive and compete with the USA. This is thethan a coalesced East Asian bloc of like-minded
China that bulled its way into the World Tradenation states.
Organization. There is a however a second andIf Asia is splitting into 2 zones of influence than is
far more powerful China. The intertwinedconflict inevitable?
economies of mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan,Conflict over Chinese ambition in Siberia, Taiwan
and the expatriate Chinese communities ofor the oil deposits that may lie in the China Sea is
Southeast Asia are an extended Chinese state.almost assured. There is no multi-lateralism in East
The second and more powerful China is a regionalAsia of the European variety that can defuse
unit based on Chinese economic and politicalescalating tensions. Even interdependent trade
power. Such a grouping will have importantdoes not stop conflict if one side is powerful and
ramifications for the East Asian sphere in thedriven by a one party dictatorship. In fact
future as China expands into Siberia taking overincreased interdependence among unequal
Russian resources, and modernizes its army andpartners can lead to friction, especially when one
navy.side sees the other party as being unfair, as were
The first China's recent 30 year economicthe cases of the US-Japan or Korea-Japan
success has propelled more people from povertyrelationships. This is especially certain when one
than other epoch in history. It is a blessing. Yetparty perceives that its vital security interests are
recently heavy hitters of US trade policyat stake. In this case even rising economic
descended on China to discuss the implications ofinterdependence is not sufficient to keep the
the $60 billion per annum trade deficit with the US.peace. For instance, expanding economic ties with
This is really a political canard. China's trade surplusTaiwan have not dissuaded Beijing from
with the US is a little larger than Japan's and mostthreatening Taiwan with the use of force including
large exporters are US and Western firmsfiring missiles and sailing out the Chinese navy to
re-exporting product from China. In fact foreignthreaten the island.
firms account for 75 % of Chinese exports. TheAnd let's face facts East Asia has never been a
argument that a Chinese deficit means a loss ofregion of peace, cooperation or even shared
jobs in the US is sheer bunk. In fact it is thevalues and mores. All of the major actors in
opposite. Cheaper offshore products produce jobsNorth-East Asia - the US, China, Russia, Japan and
locally through expanded retail operations; morethe two Koreas - have all fought each other in
product supply and spin-offs throughout the entirethe past. Even having multilateral security
production cycle; and cheaper inputs and moredialogues is not sufficient to rule out the possibility
capital for consumers and businesses.of radical changes in the political map of the
In spite of its economic reformation in the pastregion. For example, major internal political
half century, China does suffer from somedisruptions in Russia, China or North Korea can
serious problems. State bureaucracy still weighsresult in radical shifts of the region's balance of
heavily on the economy. More than 50 % ofpower and threaten peace and stability.
China's factories are state owned and manyUnresolved historical legacies, asymmetry in
industries receive generous governmentpower, conflicting national interests such as
assistance. Nationalized firms are home forterritorial disputes and national unification are
hundreds of thousands of redundant employees.limiting factors in the regional security system.
Wide scale unemployment and huge inequalitiesThe region also lacks prior habits and experiences
throughout various regions are threats to Chineseof cooperation. Thus, in North-East Asia multilateral
political stability. There is also a close connectioninstitutions are not only underdeveloped, but even
between government bureaucrats, businessthose existing are not looked upon as essential
people and party officials. It is still one of thefor peace and security.
world's poorest countries where corruption, theftWhat does all this mean?
of intellectual property; a lack of legal processes,It means that a surging China, with its extended
undemocratic politics; state theft of profits andChinese community of interests is a good
repression are supreme. Not many people I knowcandidate to bring about an East Asian conflict
would trade Chicago for Chungking.over Taiwan, Siberian resources or hegemonic
If China does not reform its political processes itaspirations of regional control. If China does not go
will most likely disintegrate. Market liberalism -through a political-cultural change that opens up
even one as controlled and narrowly targeted asdemocratic and government processes to
China's - creates a middle class that will demandWestern concepts of transparency, honesty,
political power. If China ignores the rising wealth oflegality and rights than don't expect peace. The
certain areas of the country and 'classes' it willChinese are in many ways akin to the Russians.
dissolve into civil strife. Too many people remainThey are in the game to win and selective
poor, disenfranchised, or repressed for the statemarket capitalism should not hide the fact that
to survive solely on government managedChina is a one party Communist dictatorship who
capitalism. The Chinese state has about 15-20still believes the universe revolves around the
years it is estimated to bring reform andMiddle Kingdom.
accountability to both its political and economicIn any event before China melts down into civil
processes before civil strife appears.and international conflict enjoy investing in Chinese
If one assumes that China will do nothing majorfunds and earning high returns.
about reforms it will still almost certainly